Guide To Departmental Culture and Climate

Version 2021.1

Departmental culture includes the shared norms and values of a department. Departmental climate involves how people experience and feel about the departmental culture. This section provides guidance on how to create a departmental culture and climate in which all department members feel valued, respected, included, and supported. Department members include faculty, staff, undergraduate and graduate students, and postdocs. This section provides guidance on both how to actively create a positive culture and climate for all department members and how to prevent a negative culture and climate. It provides best practices for fostering inclusivity and proactively identifying and addressing problems with your departmental climate. For guidance on practices that support

Marginalized Groups

People of color and others with marginalized ethnicities, women and others who experience misogyny, LGBTQ+ people, disabled people, and others who have traditionally been marginalized in society and in physics. According to the TEAM-UP Report, marginalized groups are “groups of people defined by a common social identity who lack adequate social power or resources to design, build, or perpetuate social structures or institutions that reflect the centrality … of their identities, proclivities, and points of view. … They need not be underrepresented or numerical minorities, but often are.” We use the term marginalized groups, rather than minorities, underrepresented groups, or other commonly used terms, because people in these groups are not always minorities or underrepresented, and in order to convey that underrepresentation is the result of marginalization rather than a statistical accident. Another common term is minoritized groups. While we use this general term for brevity and readability, it is important to recognize that the many different groups encompassed by this term face different challenges and have different needs that should be addressed individually whenever possible, to learn the terms that people ask to be called, and to recognize that these terms may change over time.

in physics, see the section on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. For guidance on creating a departmental culture and climate that is likely to retain students, see the section on Retention of Undergraduate Physics Majors.

This section provides guidance on improving your departmental climate through a cyclic process in which you (1) engage the whole department in a review of your climate; (2) establish and communicate a collective vision for a healthy culture and climate; (3) create, nurture, and expect a culture in which everyone is welcome, included, and supported; (4) value and support healthy relationships among all members and groups within the department; and (5) create and nurture programs, processes, and policies that support continuous improvement. Parts 1 and 2 describe how to lay the groundwork to ensure that your efforts are effective, and parts 3–5 describe specific strategies improving your departmental culture and climate.

Benefits

The practices in this section can support your department in creating and maintaining a collaborative, friendly, empowering, fulfilling, and joyful environment for all department members. A department that takes care of its faculty, staff, students, and postdocs and helps them succeed (through tenure, success in courses, success in their careers, and professional development) will have more satisfied department members, which enhances recruiting and retention of students, faculty, staff, and postdocs. Members of departments with positive cultures and climates are more productive in research, teaching, and learning, and such departments will have positive relationships with graduates. Departments with inclusive and supportive cultures are able to function productively and make plans and decisions even when there are disagreements about directions or style.

The Cycle of Reflection and Action

Effective Practices

Effective Practices

  1. Engage the whole department in a review of your climate

  2. Establish and communicate a collective vision for a healthy culture and climate

  3. Create, nurture, and expect a culture in which everyone is welcome, included, and supported

  4. Value and support healthy relationships within and beyond your department

  5. Create and nurture programs, processes, and policies that support continuous improvement of departmental culture and climate

Programmatic Assessments

Programmatic Assessments

  • E. Bertschinger, “What I learned as a department head,” MIT Faculty Newsletter 28(5), 4–7 (2016).
  • E. Fine and J. Sheridan, Enhancing Department Climate: A Guide for Department Chairs, Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI) (2015).
  • APS

    American Physical Society. Website

    Committee on Minorities and APS Committee on the Status of Women in Physics joint site visit program.
  • L. Schiebinger, A. R. Davies, S. K. Gilmartin, “Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know,” The Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University (2008).
  • K. O'Meara, D. Culpepper, J. Misra, and A. Jaeger, “Equity-Minded Faculty Workloads: What We Can and Should Do Now,” American Council on Education (2021).
  • C. A. Wooten and M. A. Condis, “Collegiality as a Dirty Word? Implementing Collegiality Policies in Institutions of Higher Education,” Academic Labor: Research and Artistry 2, 3 (2018).
  • See Resources for the section on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion for further resources on improving departmental culture and climate for members of

    Marginalized Groups

    People of color and others with marginalized ethnicities, women and others who experience misogyny, LGBTQ+ people, disabled people, and others who have traditionally been marginalized in society and in physics. According to the TEAM-UP Report, marginalized groups are “groups of people defined by a common social identity who lack adequate social power or resources to design, build, or perpetuate social structures or institutions that reflect the centrality … of their identities, proclivities, and points of view. … They need not be underrepresented or numerical minorities, but often are.” We use the term marginalized groups, rather than minorities, underrepresented groups, or other commonly used terms, because people in these groups are not always minorities or underrepresented, and in order to convey that underrepresentation is the result of marginalization rather than a statistical accident. Another common term is minoritized groups. While we use this general term for brevity and readability, it is important to recognize that the many different groups encompassed by this term face different challenges and have different needs that should be addressed individually whenever possible, to learn the terms that people ask to be called, and to recognize that these terms may change over time.

    .

Examples of climate surveys

See the Evidence in the section on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion for research on

Stereotype Threat

A phenomenon in which a member of a marginalized group performs poorly due to the threat of a negative stereotype about their abilities in the area being assessed, e.g., a stereotype that women or Black people are not good at math. Research demonstrates that situations that reinforce such stereotypes lead to members of marginalized groups performing more poorly on assessments related to the stereotypes, but that interventions can be designed to counteract the impact of stereotype threat. This research suggests that without such interventions, standard assessments used for admissions and hiring decisions are likely to be biased against members of marginalized groups. Review article

,

Impostor Phenomenon

A phenomenon in which a person doubts their own skills and accomplishments, attributes their success to luck rather than hard work or skill, and fears that they are an impostor who does not deserve the things they have earned. We use the original term, impostor phenomenon, rather than the more commonly used term, impostor syndrome, to emphasize that this is not a medical condition to be attributed to individuals, but a phenomenon shaped by interpersonal and social contexts that may lead people, particularly those from marginalized groups, to question their skills and accomplishments. Review article

,

Implicit Bias

Unconscious and automatic attitudes or stereotypes about groups of people that impact one’s understanding of, actions toward, and decisions regarding individual members of such groups. For example, research shows that many people in the US, even those who consciously believe that all people are equal, implicitly have biases associating Black people with criminality and Asian people with being foreign, and not associating women with science. Implicit bias has measurable consequences in the world, with research demonstrating, for example, that people rate job applicants with names typically associated with women and/or people of color as less qualified than those with names typically associated with white men, and that students rate female instructors as less competent than male instructors. Everyone has implicit biases, and countering such biases requires explicit training and/or intervention strategies such as intergroup contact, perspective-taking, and exposure to counter-stereotypical exemplars. Review article

,

Myth of Meritocracy

An ideology that argues that we live in a society in which achievements and rewards are based on merit, in the form of intelligence, hard work, or skill. This ideology tends to blame lack of success on lack of merit, and thus to obscure the impact of discrimination, bias, privilege, and unequal distribution of resources and opportunities based on race, gender, social class, and other factors. This ideology is particularly prominent in physics, where it is often argued that success or failure is based on objective criteria and therefore not influenced by culture, and where there is a strong culture of expectation of brilliance. Review article

,

Color Blindness

An ideology that argues that one does not or should not see race, and/or that the best way to address racism is to treat everyone the same and not discuss racism. Many scholars argue that this ideology is harmful because ignoring racism makes it difficult to understand and fight racism, and because people who espouse this ideology are not able to understand the full experiences and identities of people of color, whose lived experiences are profoundly impacted by race and racism. Review article

,

Microaggressions

“The everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership.” Microaggressions often appear small to, or go unnoticed by, observers and perpetrators, but because people from marginalized groups experience them so regularly, they can lead to psychological stress and exhaustion for those who experience them. Examples include complimenting an Asian-American person for their English, questioning a Black person entering a research lab about whether they are supposed to be there, and telling a female physicist that she doesn’t look like a physicist. Definition from D. W. Sue.

, bias and harassment in physics, and statistics on representation in physics.

Stay Informed with Updates
Our quarterly newsletter keeps you in the loop about events, ways to get involved, and the latest EP3 Guide content.
By signing up, I agree to the APS Privacy Policy.
EP3 Logo

Brought to you by


Funding provided by

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 1738311, 1747563, and 1821372. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

This site is governed by the APS Privacy and other policies.

© 2024 The American Physical Society
CC-BY-NC-SA